Subject: Re: XML
From: Simon North <north -at- SYNOPSYS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:02:33 +0001

Hi David, this is "from the horse's mouth" so to speak:

XML 1.0 is now a W3C Proposed Recommendation:

The announcement was formally made at the SGML/XML '97 Conference in
Washington, D.C. on Monday, December 8, 1997. This is the same
conference at which the first Working Draft of the XML specification
was released in November, 1996.

W3C member organizations now have about six weeks to vote on the PR.
Organizations may vote yes; yes, with comments; no, unless specified
deficiencies are corrected; or no, this Proposed Recommendation should
be abandoned. During this voting period, the XML Working Group
expects to resolve minor technical issues and communicate its results
to the W3C Director. After this time, the Director will announce the
disposition of the document; it may become a W3C Recommendation
(possibly with minor changes), revert to Working Draft status, or may
be dropped as a W3C work item.

While the disposition of the Proposed Recommendation is entirely at
the discretion of the Director, the XML Working Group considers its
work on XML 1.0 to be complete and does not expect to be making
substantive changes to the proposal as it now stands. There have been
a number of requests for enhancement to the specification that will be
considered for XML 1.1, but at this time the WG is strongly inclined
to delay work on XML 1.1 until some experience has been gained with
implementations of XML 1.0. In the meantime, the WG will continue its
work on XLL, the part of the XML family of specifications that deals
with linking and addressing.

Jon Bosak
Chairman, W3C XML Working Group


If I can risk a piece of blatant advertising, have you checked out
"Presenting XML" by Richrad Light, Sams.Net, co-authored by yours
truly? (we're starting work on an updated second edition now, for
release in the new year).

Simon North.

Simon North north -at- synopsys -dot- com
COSSAP Technical Writer, Aachen, Germany

To be or not to be, those are the parameters., or

Previous by Author: Re: Software requirements writers?
Next by Author: Re: That ole dictionary thread agin. ...(again?)
Previous by Thread: Re: XML
Next by Thread: XML

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads