Re: Acronyms--RTFM

Subject: Re: Acronyms--RTFM
From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- MAIL -dot- BC -dot- ROGERS -dot- WAVE -dot- CA>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 22:34:08 -0800

On Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:41:00 -0500, Peter G Margaritis wrote:

>> Uh, that would be RTFO-LM. But personally, I think the F is tastless
>> and crude, adding nothing to the instruction and demeaning not just the
>> reader but the writer (if only because it's verbose). Why not just
>> leave it out?

It's not bad enough that y'all gotta mess with the English language, but
now you want to PC'ify a time-honored geek acronym too?!

<radfc>



Your friend and mine,
Matt
<insert standard disclaimer here>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.



Previous by Author: Re: Acronyms--RTFM
Next by Author: Re: Acronyms--RTFM
Previous by Thread: Re: Acronyms--RTFM
Next by Thread: Re: Acronyms--RTFM


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads