bc/bce

Subject: bc/bce
From: Henry Vandelinde <vandelinde -at- WORDTEK -dot- ON -dot- CA>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 08:04:45 -0500

Mark,

But, don't you think that the references BC/AD have lost their particular
Christian significance over the centuries so that the terms themselves have
been secularized. The association with the baseline has become the
dominant definition, not the actual event they originate in.

Terminology changes in time and associations lose their significance of
alter. That is what keeps the deconstructionists going. If one were to
extend your argument, we would paying pagan homage to Woden every wednesday.

Henry
=================================================
Henry Vandelinde, Ph.D.
WordTek Document Services Inc.
513 Kengary Drive, Ennismore, Ontario
Canada, K0L 1T0
Fax & Phone: (705) 292-1956
Email: Vandelinde -at- WordTek -dot- on -dot- ca -dot-
http://www.wordtek.on.ca

Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.



Previous by Author: the role of the tech writer
Next by Author: Re: Usage of a the word "BUT"
Previous by Thread: Re: Entry-level requirements
Next by Thread: Re: BC/BCE


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads