TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: QUESTION: ISO compliance & archived documents From:Laura Bean Warner <laura -dot- bean -at- DELTEC -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 28 Oct 1997 14:44:24 -0600
My current place of employment uses the first method; all changes are
recorded on one copy. This same method was used at my last place of
employment. At a company I worked at prior to that, all reviewers
comments were saved separately for drafts, where each time a draft was
created, only the most recent draft copies were saved. Then, when
revising a the official document, only one copy was circulated, and each
reviewer initialed and dated his or her comments.
