verbs

Subject: verbs
From: "Wittel, Teresa J." <WITTTJ -at- NCSLINK -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 15:50:00 -0700

Hi John (and anyone else following this silly thread),

Actually, I wasn't thinking of the get-passive constuction of lay.
Perhaps I am thinking of an instance of mis-use of the verb.

She ___ with her husband to be. You can't use lie - it doesn't sound
right and it isn't past tense (could be, but I don't think it HAS to
be). (All this pussy-footin' around can be confusing.)

At any rate - techwriters don't get to use it!!!
(This is all Jason's fault....)

Please continue thread off-list, if interested.

***********************************
Teresa Wittel
mailto:WITTTJ -at- ncslink -dot- com
Sr. Information Developer
NCS Education, Mesa AZ
***********************************

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: verbs
Next by Author: Re: imperative
Previous by Thread: Re: verbs
Next by Thread: 4 Technical Writer Permanent Job Openings in Minnesota


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads