Re[2]: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: Scott Miller <scott_miller -at- CCMAIL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:25:24 -0800

Matt sez...

>>>>If I were to start using "scott" in reference to something negative, and
over time that caught on so that the most common usage of the word was in
reference to that that negative thing, would you then change your name
because of its "negative connotations"?<<<<

I avoid "abort" not because of political correctness, and not for fear of
offending someone. As a couple of people pointed out, some words carry
additional meanings that can be distracting. By using "cancel" instead of
"abort," I prevent the image of a bloody foetus from popping into the reader's
mind while I'm trying to keep them focused on the task at hand. That just seems
like a good writing practice to me.

By the way, I once met a recent immigrant who's name was Phuc, pronounced as you
think it would be. He changed his name.

- Scott_Miller -at- ccmail -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Author: Re: Word Fast-saves & FrameMaker
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads