TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
When an analogy is likely to distract the reader from the topic at hand,
it is a good idea to investigate other possible analogies.
The terms "slave" and "master" carry significant emotional baggage for
some readers. I consider them "expensive." Each word I use costs me
reader attention, some words cost more than others. Usualy, I think of
the cost of a word in terms of length and familiarity. But emotional
content is also a factor.
I'm not about to try to change the terminology of an industry - that
would be even more expensive.
Mike Huber
mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Orr [SMTP:whitears -at- interaccess -dot- com]
>
>Maybe I'm just dense. Can someone explain why slave/master analogies are
>per se insensitive?
>
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
