Re: 22.5 hrs to post a message?

Subject: Re: 22.5 hrs to post a message?
From: "Friedman, Michael" <mhf -at- DSC -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 08:59:41 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: Cramer, Kim [SMTP:kcramer -at- NCSLINK -dot- COM]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 1997 8:49 AM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: 22.5 hrs to post a message?

John Wilcox said:
> These two messages that I sent yesterday morning showed up on the
list
> this morning, over 22 hours later. This is ridiculous. Does this
> happen to other people? It's possible that it just took a long time
to
> get out of Weyerhaeuser.

The stuff I've posted shows up fairly quickly, but I've had another
problem. I often read replys from list members to posts that I never
received. I don't get the digest format, so I'm wondering why some
messages never get to me. Anybody else with this problem?
_____________________________________

Yes. I think what happens sometimes is that people respond off list to
someone, who then responds to them on-list. At least that's my guess.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Re[6]: Certification Redux [Ref:C704876]
Next by Author: Re: Eliminating the need for technical support
Previous by Thread: Re: 22.5 hrs to post a message?
Next by Thread: Re: 22.5 hrs to post a message?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads