Re: Re[6]: Certification Redux [Ref:C704876]

Subject: Re: Re[6]: Certification Redux [Ref:C704876]
From: Dave Whelan <agi259 -at- FREENET -dot- MB -dot- CA>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:36:43 -0500

Geoff,

Sorry that my little attempt at humour got you so riled up. I was only
trying to lighten up the turgid debate involving the C word. I did look up
redux in my Oxford English Encyclopedic - not there. I stretched over for my
Gage Canadian - not there. My Webster's was just out of reach and I didn't
feel like stretching any further on such a lighthearted mission. If a word
is not in the other two it generally means it is only used by a few people
in a small area of the world (dive dive dive - flame alert).

BTW, I have heard of that Updike guy, didn't he write a book about rabbits?

Regards,
Dave.
***************************************************
Dave Whelan, Technical Writer
Whelan Technical Services (204) 334-1339
mailto:agi259 -at- freenet -dot- mb -dot- ca
http://www.winnipeg.freenet.mb.ca/~agi259
***************************************************

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Re[4]: Certification Redux
Next by Author: Re: Is Microsoft Word a hog?
Previous by Thread: Re[6]: Certification Redux [Ref:C704876]
Next by Thread: Re: Re[6]: Certification Redux [Ref:C704876]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads