Re: on-line vs. hard copy

Subject: Re: on-line vs. hard copy
From: Becca Price <rp51 -at- CHRYSLER -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 13:30:21 -0400

the brief answer is, you can - if you want poorly organized help files.

<soapbox>
People use help files *differently* than they use paper docs. They
don't want to browse, they want to get the specific information when
they need it. So you use more headings in online help, to break up
text into smaller, more focused topics. You create different types of
topics: background, information, conceptual, procedural, "how to" -
there's an infinite variety of possibilities. In essence, paper dox
and online help are strucutred differently.

also, people navigate help differently than page turning in a paper
doc. So you need more cross references: leads to related topics,
interesting tangents, and more detailed/more high-level information.
There's also more redundancy, because you have to put all *relevant*
information in a specific topic, and can't assume that your users will
make "see also" jumps.

this is the basic falacy behind programs such as Doc-to-help (which is,
IMHO, a technically better application than RoboHelp is - but the
underlying falacy makes it much less useful). D2H assumes that paper
and online help can be structured the same, and they can't. IMHO, YMMV.

</soapbox>
-becca

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Resources for Writing White Papers
Next by Author: looking for books re: Ventura 7
Previous by Thread: on-line vs. hard copy
Next by Thread: techwr job stats & curriculum


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads