Re: Bad Employers/Clients List

Subject: Re: Bad Employers/Clients List
From: Buck & Tilly Buchanan <writer -at- DHC -dot- NET>
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 13:17:05 -0500

Lynda Straus wrote:
> I'd definitely go for the *informational* format. (This is how
> long it took to get paid on a 30-day invoice, or, extensive changes
> requiring an additional 50 [unpaid] hours of work was required to get paid
> on the original contract.)
Sounds like the best way to me

Buck Buchanan
writer -at- dhc -dot- net
Arlington, TX

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Bad Employers/Clients List???
Next by Author: Re: Bad Employers list--better business bureau?
Previous by Thread: Bad Employers/Clients List
Next by Thread: Re: Bad Employers/Clients List


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads