Adobe PageMill

Subject: Adobe PageMill
From: geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 11:09:39 -0500

Emily Leavitt asked about Adobe PageMill. Emily, the
original version of the software got favorable reviews in
the trade press, despite significant limitations; the
updated version was heavily panned (see the latest issue of
_Publish_ for details). The consensus seems to be that the
software is a decent, but simplistic, way to visually
create Web pages (i.e., without having to hand-code HTML),
but that far better tools exist for sophisticated users.
One problem that disqualifies the software as a useful tool
(in my opinion, based solely on the reviews I've read
rather than on personal experience) is that it converts
HTML tags it doesn't recognize and uses a few nonstandard
tags that common browsers such as Netscape don't recognize.
If the review is correct, that's inexcusable behavior.

--Geoff Hart @8^{)} geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
Disclaimer: Speaking for myself, not FERIC.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Tracking bugs: summary of responses
Next by Author: Documentation management
Previous by Thread: Re: Adobe PageMill
Next by Thread: Re: JOB POSTING: Technical Marketing Writer

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads