TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
We're looking into the same kinds of questions.
One observation: from the choice you're about to make, it sounds like
you're interested strictly in Revision Control, and not in tools that
also provide for automated "publication" to such forms as intranets or
to the Web.
If this isn't true, you may want to look again at PC DOCS, or IntraNet
Solutions' IntraDoc, etc.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tammy Hale [SMTP:tammyh -at- FGM -dot- COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 1997 7:23 AM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Document Management Tools
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>Some of you may remember my query to the list last year about document
>management. My company never did come up with a system, and as we continue
>to grow we're realizing we can't hold off much longer.
>
>Last time around I received a lot of good information on doc mgt. in
>general. However, I'm still not an authority in the area so I would like to
>get your input on the tool recommendation that I'm about the make to my
>company.
>
>I've looked at PC Docs Open, OPTIX, and the developer CM tool called
>SourceSafe. OPTIX is not at all what we need, and PC Docs Open (what a
>weird name!) doesn't seem to do anything more than SourceSafe, which my
>company already uses for software development. I'm planning on recommending
> that we use SourceSafe as our doc mgt. tool.
>
>What do you think? In the archives I found a posting from Laura Storey that
>she "abstained from integrating [her] docs into [SourceSafe] databases."
>Laura, if you're still around, I'd be interested in your reasoning.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Tammy Hale
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
