TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Editorial Latitude From:danm -at- DEV -dot- TIVOLI -dot- COM Date:Fri, 11 Apr 1997 12:30:18 -0500
OK, my bad. I was referring to the specific situation that was brought up in
the original posting. I should have said that. In this case, it sounds like
the editor added words that did not belong there. I argue that it is the
editor's responsibility to make sure whatever edits are made *do not* change the
meaning of the article. Otherwise, it is sloppy editing.
Senior Technical Writer
danm -at- tivoli -dot- com
> Huh? If there are words *missing*, either dropped or needed for
> clarification, a good editor still wouldn't add them?
> Every good editor has done a bad edit at some point. To call someone a poor
> editor on that basis is, well, poor.
> Best regards,
> Brian Baresch, baresch -at- cjnetworks -dot- com