Re: HTML Standards (Re: Word '97 vs. Frame 5.1.1)

Subject: Re: HTML Standards (Re: Word '97 vs. Frame 5.1.1)
From: Matt Ion <soundy -at- NEXTLEVEL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 04:27:40 -0800

On Thu, 03 Apr 1997 03:23:04 -0600, Paula Puffer wrote:

>When I code HTML, I try to code to the standard set out by the WWW Consortium.
>That way I don't have to deal with the proprietary tags that NS/IE have and
>my documents are viewable by the widest possible audience. As long as I
>apply the design principles I have learned, I turn out great pages that
>don't need a lot of bells and whistles to get your attention.

Amen! Bells and whistles are nice to play with, but if you **NEED**
them to create an interesting page, you're probably in the wrong line
of work.

Your friend and mine,
<insert standard disclaimer here>

And the men who hold high places
Must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality
Closer to the heart
- Rush, "Closer To The Heart"

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: How many PCs does
Next by Author: Re: PC Processing Power/You'll Know You're a Tech Writer When . . .
Previous by Thread: HTML Standards (Re: Word '97 vs. Frame 5.1.1)
Next by Thread: Senior TW position in Provo, Utah

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads