Re: Heading number 1.?

Subject: Re: Heading number 1.?
From: WRONECKI Frederic DG <frederic -dot- wronecki -at- FRANCETELECOM -dot- FR>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:20:36 +0100

Iain Harrison wrote :

> Personally, I dislike legal numbering in any case, but I
> particularly dislike the format 1.2.3. Why is there a decimal
> point after the last digit?

> If forced to go down the numbered heading route, why not use

> 1
> 1.1
> 1.1.1

> etc?

Iain, this is THE standard (ISO 2145) method for numbering. I never
understood why WinWord inserted a decimal point !
Frederic Wronecki
France Telecom, Paris, France
mailto : frederic -dot- wronecki -at- francetelecom -dot- fr

Previous by Author: Re: To document Windows functions or not?
Next by Author: Re: Winword documentation
Previous by Thread: Re: Heading number 1.?
Next by Thread: Advice sought: PDF -> HTML

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads