TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re: Killer Language From:"Wing, Michael J" <mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:56:16 -0600
>> It is NOT "universally accepted". I would hesitate to call the female
>> end of a serial cable, a "socket".
>>Well, *you* might hesitate. But a quick check of the electronics catalogs in
>>our lab shows many electronic supply firms don't share your hesitation. That
>>particular designation has found its way to print so often it's become part
>>of the designator -- "DB25S," where the "S" means socket -- in the catalogs.
>>My unscientific survey turns up pin/socket almost as often as male/female in
>>describing the parts. While you might risk bewildering the non-technical
>>members of your audience by using pin and socket instead of male and female,
>>I don't think you'd even cause an engineer to pause.
Now I'm really confused. When I worked at Raytheon, many of the
connectors had sockets and pins. Furthermore, their mating connectors
(this terminology will probably start a new thread) also had pins and
sockets. I guess these connectors are hermaphrodites ;^).
| Michael Wing
| Principal Technical Writer
| Infrastructure Technical Information Development
| Intergraph Corporation
| Huntsville, Alabama
| (205) 730-7250
| mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com