TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Illustrators and Writers and who should do which From:Peter Gold <pgold -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 15 May 1996 10:40:22 -0700
The number and variety of responses to this thread indicate that there's
no consensus on something central. The elephant is not visible, but all
responders have a sure grip on a piece or two of its anatomy.
I'm not sure what the part is that I'm hanging on to, but here's how I'd
One aspect of the problem I don't think has been addressed is that of how
to present a particular topic, idea, concept, "information unit." For
example, Tufte's books and theories on graphical representation of
numeric and mathematical ideas illustrate (no pun intended) that some
purely mathematical facts can be presented in several forms - pure
numbers (formulas, equations, expressions), hybrids (text and numbers,
graphs), and other visual representations including drawings (to quote
Arlo Guthrie's "Alice's Restaurant", "8x10 color glossy photographs with
circles and arrows on the backs of each one").
Michael Maloney notes that writer and illustrator collaborating can
invent combinations that suit the needs of their respective views of the
appropriate way to reach same audience. Similarly, the left/right brain
hemispheres of an individual author can collaborate.
As in the recent discussions of tool-competency here, if it's a skill
issue, then the skill is needed, and the best-skilled person available is
the right one to do it. Sometimes the skill is visualizing the problem,
sometimes it's drawing what is visualized. If you can do both, then
that's the answer; if not, do the part you can, and collaborate on the other.
The job is to get the information to the audience, and whatever means does
that, that's the right one. Territoriality is counterproductive. To
*illustrate* this, I'd draw two pictures of a hill with "audience" at the
top. In one, the "good" Sisyphus would be pushing the rock up the hill
and the "bad" Sisyphus pushing it down at the same time. In the other,
both Sisyphuses (Sisyphi?) would be pushing it uphill together.
__________________peter gold pgold -at- netcom -dot- com__________________
"We shape our tools; thereafter, our tools shape us.
We ape our tools; thereafter, our tools ape us."
________...Marshall McLuhan, based on Ted Carpenter's idea_____
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net