TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: English is evolving.. what to do? what to do? From:soundy -at- NEXTLEVEL -dot- COM Date:Thu, 7 Mar 1996 03:14:34 -0600
In <313CE229 -at- instigate -dot- dataware -dot- com>, on 03/05/96 at 04:53 PM,
Trey Jones <TJones -at- dataware -dot- com> said:
>So, the "you and I" situation exemplified above is easy to describe, and
>turns out to be entirely positional for some speakers (which drives
>Generative Linguists insane, I'm sure, but I'll save *that* for
>LINGUST).. If the first person pronoun comes first in the conjuction, it
>is "me", if it comes second, it is "I".. thus all of the following are
>acceptable:
> John and I are going to the store.
> Me and John are going to the store.
> Do you want to come with me and John?
> Do you want to come with John and I?
Actually, proper useage is far simpler (and more logical) than that:
simply remove the second- or third-person pronoun and see how the
first-person stands on its own. Example:
..I am(are) going to the store. - good
Me... am(are) going to the store. - NOT good
Do you want to come with me...? - good
Do you want to come with...I? - NOT good
>The perceived difference is one of formality, not grammaticallity, with
>the ".. and I" constructions being more formal and polite, or course.
>This change has taken root *everywhere*.. from my 17 year old brother
>(who always says "me and..") to the top execs of the company I work for
>(who always say "..and I")..
My mother always used to correct us when we'd use "Me and..." by saying we
shouldn't say so-and-so is mean ("me and Bob" slurs into "mean Bob" :-)
>Similar circumstances crop up with "who/ whom", which has also picked up
>a distinction based on position, not case.
> Who is it addressed to?
> To whom is it addressed?
>Then there's "there's", which can take singular or plural objects for
>many speakers.
This is obsolete. Our evolving language dictates that there's and theirs
may be used interchangeably. Thus theirs no simply rule for how people
use they're there's.
>And, last but not least, ending sentences with prepositions. Should I
>have said "the top execs of the company for which I work"?
The ending of sentences with prepositions is a one mistake, up with which
I will not put. :-)
Your friend and mine,
Matt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Maybe all I need, besides my pills and surgery,
is a new metaphor for... reality." -- Queensryche
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Next Level
Productions, or anyone else of sound mind from this planet or
dimension!