TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer From:soundy -at- NEXTLEVEL -dot- COM Date:Mon, 4 Mar 1996 10:38:11 -0600
In <01I1XLOPZ7W6000SHQ -at- CORE -dot- Corp -dot- JCI -dot- Com>, on 03/04/96 at 07:09 AM,
Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- jci -dot- com said:
>Acrobat was from the start designed as a way of displaying documents
>across platforms without losing layout information, sort of an
>application-level version of "Display Postscript."
My one beef is that, once again, Adobe has handily ignored a particular
major platform in their viewer support...
>In this respect it
>succeeds far better than WinHelp (I've yet to be able to open a WinHelp
>file on an HP Unix workstation, while I can even read Inside Macintosh
>volumes on an HP using Acrobat).
On the flipside, I can view WinHelp files on my OS/2 system, but I can't
view Acrobat files unless I have Windows support installed.
>how often I've heard a non-Windows user complain, "But if I'd wanted a
>Windows machine, I would have *bought* a Windows machine!" Yes, you can
The one that really gets me is the all-too-pat "but you can use our
Windows version under OS/2" answer that I get from far too many vendors
when asking about platform support. Excuse me, I didn't ask you if I
coule do that. Maybe I don't WANT Windows on this machine. Maybe I don't
WANT to give up 12MB of drive space as a runtime for your software
(including Acrobat).
>still manage to hold on to those users, but their threshold for switching
>has now been lowered, and you will most likely lose them to the best of
>your competitors to avoid that particular trap.
>For those users, Acrobat might be considered acceptable "neutral
>territory."
HTML is a far more neutral, and now a perfectly viable option (as long
people don't start going crazy on Netscrap-proprietary tags).
Your friend and mine,
Matt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Maybe all I need, besides my pills and surgery,
is a new metaphor for... reality." -- Queensryche
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Next Level
Productions, or anyone else of sound mind from this planet or
dimension!
