TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
? In a bigger company, the sample may ...
(a) include work of other writers and
(b) have been heavily edited (locally or by client).
(c) be written in a /strange/ way to satisfy the customer (e.g. SCRDLs,
TMCRs) -- threaded fastener
Why do HR and non-writing types think a sample is a true representation of a
writer's talent? Is it a /got'ta do it 'cause everyone else does it?/ thing?
Do HR and non-writing types really READ all the samples they receive?
If we cannot trust writing samples, how can we /test/ a prospective employee?
I have been given editing tests, but in most cases, employment depends upon
a /feeling/ ... with other writers and with non-writers.
As someone else suggested, how can you show confidential work? Our favorite
uncle is funny about sharing.
