TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: passive voice From:Tammy Hale <tammyh -at- FGM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 25 Jan 1996 11:19:40 -0500
I don't mean to give David a hard time, but I had to point out the irony in
his post. David wrote,
>IMHO, use of passive voice is rarely defensable
in the passive voice! He went on to argue that
>In writing today, it passive
>construction is all to commonly used to hide the identity of those who act
>(active voice).
David, where is the active agent in the preceding sentence? I think your
post supports the view that sometimes the passive voice is indeed
appropriate.
