TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In article <9509070848 -dot- AA29310 -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il>, Mark Levinson <mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il> writes:
>Karen Kay says:
> I really can't think of a situation
> where 'set', 'modem', and 'for' all co-occur. It sounds colloquially
> inaccurate to my ear.
>The way you set your electric iron for wool or for cotton, I can
>imagine you might think of setting a modem "for" a particular
>speed. It means thinking of the speed more as a characteristic
>of the data that the modem handles than as a characteristic of
>the modem itself. I can understand such a point of view, but
>I'm not sure I'd promote it...
> mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il
So, would it then be accurate to say "set your modem for CTS/RTS flow
control?
