Re: What's on topic

Subject: Re: What's on topic
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 1995 09:50:41 +0800

> Paul Race wrote:
> (snip)
> Unfortunately, the @-sign discussion has nowhere else to go. So we get
> it by default. In an odd, sad sort of way, I can't think of anything that
> defines the _flavour_ of this profession more than the @ sign discussion.
> Not only do I have difficulty thinking of another list where the discussion
> would be more appropriate, I have difficulty imagining another list where
> the discussion would even take place.

It's not a list, but try the alt.usage.english newsgroup. The @ question
comes up so often it is almost the canonical newbie post.

a.u.e is mainly a recreational group but many professional linguists,
academics, computer types and dictionary bashers hang out there. There
are even some techwhirlers -- that's how I found out about techwr-l
(thanks Bev!).

I've appended some bits and pieces from the FAQ. Sorry for the bandwidth,
but I hope this will help reduce traffic in our list by giving whirlers a
'first resort' for language questions.

Two warnings: 1) it's a huge list. 100 - 150 messages per day.
2) PLEASE READ THE FAQ *BEFORE* POSTING!

Please excuse the shout. The reason it's such a big group is that so
many new readers don't look in the FAQ first.

Regards and have fun. Oh, and if you want to know more, follow-ups to me.
---
Stuart Burnfield I thought logorrhoea was an affliction
Voice: +61 9 328 8288 of lumberjacks, till I discovered
PO Box 192 Leederville alt.usage.english
Western Australia 6903

------------------------------------------------------------------------

WELCOME TO ALT.USAGE.ENGLISH!
-----------------------------

alt.usage.english is a newsgroup where we discuss the English
language (and also occasionally other languages). We discuss
how particular words, phrases, and syntactic forms are used; how
they originated; and where in the English-speaking world they're
prevalent. (All this is called "description".) We also discuss
how we think they *should* be used ("prescription").

alt.usage.english is for everyone, *not* only for linguists,
native speakers, or descriptivists.
...
recommended books
dictionaries
online dictionaries
general reference
grammars
books on linguistics
books on usage
books that discriminate synonyms
style manuals
books on mathematical exposition
books on phrasal verbs
books on phrase origins
books on Britishisms, Canadianisms, etc.
books on "bias-free"/"politically correct" language
books on group names

usage disputes
"acronym"
"alot"
"alright"
"between you and I"
"could care less"
"different to", "different than"
double "is"
"due to"
gender-neutral pronouns
"hopefully", "thankfully"
"It's me" vs "it is I"
"less" vs "fewer"
"more/most/very unique"
"none is" vs "none are"
plurals
plurals of Latin and Greek words
plurals => English singulars
preposition at end
repeated words after abbreviations
"shall" vs "will", "would" vs "should"
split infinitive
"that" vs "which"

punctuation
"." after abbreviations
," vs ",
"A, B and C" vs "A, B, and C"

spelling
diacritics
"-er" vs "-re"
"-ize" vs "-ise"
possessive apostrophes


Previous by Author: Re: against "we"
Next by Author: Re: Measuring Productivity
Previous by Thread: Re: What's on topic
Next by Thread: Re: VISIO AND FRAME


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads