Re: PETALUMA CA-Tech Writer Staff

Subject: Re: PETALUMA CA-Tech Writer Staff
From: Steve Arrants <stephena -at- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 20:14:40 -0700

'Jeffrey Pittman' writes:

> In a message dated 95-08-14 13:27:53 EDT, stephena -at- NETCOM -dot- COM (Steve Arrants)
> writes:

> >o Windows 3.1, NT, 95 (at this point, some familiarity w/Win95, such as
> > participation in the Beta release program is OK).

> Gee, that's really nice, especially seeing as Win95 has yet to be released!
> My wife's end of our business is software consulting and support. To enable
> her to fulfill the evaluation end of a software support contract, one of her
> clients has provided her with a licensed beta copy of Win95. I composed the
> finished document from her notes. This has given me some familiarity with
> Win95, but I'm the exception in the writing community. Isn't this being a
> bit too selective?
> Good luck,
> J.P.

I don't think so. Microsoft has sent out jillions of beta disks, preview
disks, first look disks, etc. I'd be real surprised to find someone who hasn't
at least seen it demo'd.


Previous by Author: Re: Technicle Riter for Windoze Stuff
Next by Author: Re: Steve Arrants's job posting:
Previous by Thread: Re: PETALUMA CA-Tech Writer Staff
Next by Thread: Re: PETALUMA CA-Tech Writer Staff


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads