Re: Generic "he" summary

Subject: Re: Generic "he" summary
From: "Jean D. Ichbiah" <ichbiah -at- JDI -dot- TIAC -dot- NET>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 22:28:38 -0400

In article <199508090034 -dot- RAA28847 -at- infinity -dot- c2 -dot- org> Richard Mateosian
<srm -at- c2 -dot- org> writes:

>4. In some cases, generic "he" gives prose an immediacy that no readily
> available reformulation can match
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>This is a subjective matter, but I don't really see a noticable difference
>in immediacy among the following:

>When a doctor hears his patient's pleas, what is he to do? Where will he
>find the answer? In his training? In his faith in God? In his innermost
>soul? When he faces the patient, he faces himself.

>When doctors hear their patients' pleas, what are they to do? Where will
>they find the answer? In their training? In their faith in God? In their
>innermost soul? When they face the patient, they face themselves.

Really? You do not see the difference? Literally, the second is collective
and applies to several doctors receiving several pleas - not to one doctor
receiving one plea.


Previous by Author: Re: The myth of sexist language
Next by Author: Re: the pound sign (#)
Previous by Thread: Re: Generic "he" summary
Next by Thread: Re: Generic "he" summary


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads