Re: gender bias in language

Subject: Re: gender bias in language
From: Win Day <winday -at- IDIRECT -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 10:37:18 -0400

Gene Ledbetter wrote:

<snip>

>James Perkins mentioned the idiosyncratic convention of
>using the pronoun "she," rather than the traditional "he,"
>when referring to an anonymous individual. I once owned an
>entire book that followed this unconvention. The practice
>was distracting and irritating, and it detracted from an
>otherwise interesting book on how to get published. I have
>also read material in which the author alternated between
>"he" and "she." This practice was extremely irritating, and
>I tossed the fool thing aside unread.


<snip>

So you found the practice of using "she" to refer to an anonymous individual
"distracting and irritating"? How do you think I feel when I see "he" used
indiscriminately? I find it distracting and irritating that the author
couldn't be bothered to even imagine that a woman would read the material.

Grow up.

Win
-----------------
Win Day
Technical Writer/Editor
Email: winday -at- idirect -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: Hideous grammar
Next by Author: Re: Generic "he" summary
Previous by Thread: Re: gender bias in language
Next by Thread: Re: gender bias in language


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads