TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: modems From:Matt Ion <mion -at- DIRECT -dot- CA> Date:Sat, 22 Jul 1995 09:27:44 PDT
On Thu, 20 Jul 1995 22:54:55 -0400 you wrote:
>Sorry to disagree with you, Mike, but unless your PC has a 16550 UART
>(Universal Asyncronous Receiver/Transmitter, which is a buffer for data
>flow) on the COM port your modem uses, an external modem is not necessarily
>the best solution.
It depends a lot on how much else you're doing with your computer while
transferring, and how well your computer can handle doing background tasks.
If you have a 486 and run plain DOS communications, the machine should keep up
nicely to a 28.8. If you use Windows or OS/2 or any other sort of
multitasker, a 16550 is almost a necessity for anything above 9600 (although
my system, a 386/33 running OS/2, has been getting by with a 14.4 and without
a 16550 for months... no problems unless I do something really
system-intensive, like access the floppy).
> However, you're right that on an external modem you can see the flashing
>light indicators and reset the modem easily.
I can't begin to count the number of times I've been frustrated by someone
else's internal modem... try to dial once, the modem locks up for some reason,
and I have to reboot the whole bloody machine (a simple CTRL-ALT-DEL won't do,
either - it generally requires a power-off to reset the modem). Regular
reboots may not mean too much to Windows users, but I'm used to uptimes of two
weeks to a month on my machine... I'd go crazy having to reboot all the time
:)
>Most name brand name internal modems have 16550 UARTs built in, so you don't
>have to worry about this buffer on your existing COM port, since the modem's
>on-board UART overrides it.
Indeed, any existing COM ports that share an address with the internal modem
would have to be disabled (this can be a pain on some machines with nameless
multi-I/O cards sporting scads of unlabelled jumpers).
>Since I bought my USR 14.4 internal (wish I'd
>bought a 28.8 now), I haven't had a glitch.
>The $10-$30 difference between the
>internal (cheaper) and external (more expensive) model of the same make and
>model of modem is negligible to some, the deciding factor for others.
Until you have to reboot to reset your internal a few times... the extra $30
gets spent on Aspirin pretty quickly :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed / ROCK-IT SCIENCE Mobile Audio and Security
do not necessarily /| ...the 1040 MIDI & Music BBS Technical Services
reflect those of any [ SOUNDMAN Internet mion -at- direct -dot- ca Fido 1:153/7106
marginally sane human \| WWW http://www.musicwest.com/1040bbs/
being anywhere. \ FAX: (604)253-8312 DATA: (604)732-4446
---------------------------------------------------------------------------