TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Due To: the real story From:Mark Levinson <mark -at- SD -dot- CO -dot- IL> Date:Thu, 25 May 1995 10:20:43 IDT
Just my nit-picky self... the common use of "due to" is bastardized English,
and will probably never go away (and, I admit, probably shouldn't).
** Probably won't, but should. If I'd been your Grade 10 teacher I would have
given a very different explanation.
"Due" is an adjective. Your paper is due. Your rent is due. Your
lateness was due to traffic. Our failure was due to circumstances
beyond our control. Properly used, "due" modifies a noun, like any
It's wrong to say "I was late due to traffic." In such a construction,
the adjective "due" is not modifying anything. "Because of" is what
you want in a sentence like that.
||- Mark L. Levinson, mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il -- Box 5780, 46157 Herzlia, Israel -||
|| You can't judge right by looking at the wrong. - Willie Dixon ||