Re: review

Subject: Re: review
From: "Pickett-Harner, Molly" <mop1 -at- NIORDS1 -dot- EM -dot- CDC -dot- GOV>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 10:35:00 EST

The paper quality of my copy is quite good (not at all "see-through").
Mayhaps Roy owns an anomalous specimen?

Molly Pickett-Harner
mop1 -at- niords1 -dot- em -dot- cdc -dot- gov
harner -at- access -dot- mountain -dot- net
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: review
Date: Monday, May 22, 1995 7:38AM

Roy Johnson, in his review of Nicholas Negroponte's book, said:
>In fact the book is produced on paper of such poor
>quality that you can read the print on both sides at once. [It's not
>clear if this is a high-tech device or an ironic comment from the

Previous by Author: Re: "Platform"
Next by Author: Are you a striped bass? (humor)
Previous by Thread: Re: review
Next by Thread: HELP: Tag Line

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads