TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Someone asked what can these grammar checking programs provide that a good
I guess my answer would be "nothing" of course. They can't provide squat.
But they can *do* some things for you that you might want done by a machine
rather than by hand.
Especially the one built right into WordPerfect (it's either Grammatik or
RightWriter -- I forget which).
The nicest aspect is that you can not only get a rough feel for the
difficulty of your entire document but you can also check individual chunks
to see if you've maintained a roughly consistent style throughout. In long
documents done over a long period of time this can be very helpful.
I agree completely that the solutions that grammar checkers provide are
asinine as often as not--but also have found the difficulty index feature to
be very helpful.
(PS: I think a lot of people's resistance to these could have been avoided
if the developers of these algorithms had *resisted* the tempation to
produce answers that supposedly correlate to years of education. It was
that obvious choice for a metric but it was bound to set up a "human vs.
machine" issue that really is not there. Grammar checkers are simply crude
AI programs processing strings of digits in response to programmed rules.
If they produced a number that was *clearly* different from "grade levels" I
think this would be easier to remember. It's an interesting problem for
technical communicators--how to avoid getting emotional responses to a term
you introduce without realizing that it will threaten some users.)
John Gear (catalyst -at- pacifier -dot- com)
The Bill of Rights--The Original Contract with America
Accept no substitutes. Beware of imitations. Insist on the genuine articles.