TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
-> We recently had a publication come back from the printer where the
-> headings varied in ink density from page to page. The heads were
-> supposed to be 100% black but on a spread, one page had a 100% blac
-> head and the other had an 80% black head. The printer said it was a
-> problem with the software, not ink coverage.
Look closely at the "gray" page to see if you see a dot pattern. Use a
magnifying glass if you have to. If you don't see dots, your printer's
explanation is bogus and you're entitled to negotiate a rerun or a
reduction in the price for the job. Sounds to me like they're BSing
you and blaming software for a perfectly ordinary press screwup.
I can't think of any circumstances where a software program would
randomly assign a screen to elements in a page without deliberate human
intervention. A bug that weird would maybe not be discussed with as much
enthusiasm as the Pentium problem, but it would not have gone unnoticed
in the industry either.
Gwen gwen -dot- barnes -at- mustang -dot- com
MSI * Connecting the world 805-873-2500