Re: @ sign is not "ampersand"

Subject: Re: @ sign is not "ampersand"
From: Marc Santacroce <santa -at- TFS -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 09:45:47 -0800

At 3:39 PM 5/9/95, Everman, Daniel wrote:

>Ok, ok. Thanks to all you alert readers out there, I am now *thoroughly*
>convinced that the @ sign is NOT called the ampersand, and that the ampersand
>looks like '&'.

>I am new to this use-group format, & this was my first experience posting an
>blatant inaccuracy. Wow! What a response! I'm sure I'll be more careful in
>the future. :-)

>Dan Everman
Welcome to the group!


M_a_r_c_ A. _S_a_n_t_a_c_r_o_c_e_________________________
Technical Writer/Trainer TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
300 Lakeside Dr. Oakland, CA 94612-3540
(510) 645-3469 (W) (510) 944-9814 (H)
santa -at- tfs -dot- com (W) santacroce -at- aol -dot- com (H)

"It's easier to get forgiveness than permission"

Previous by Author: Re[2]: @ sign
Next by Author: Re: Typeover Mode
Previous by Thread: @ sign is not "ampersand"
Next by Thread: Internships in Boston?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads