Re: STC attendees reactions to SGML sessions?

Subject: Re: STC attendees reactions to SGML sessions?
From: Jean Pfleiderer <pfleiderer_j -at- WIZARD -dot- COLORADO -dot- EDU>
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 08:24:23 LCL

In article <9505081753 -dot- AA2439 -at- worldcom-18 -dot- worldcom -dot- com> Chet Ensign
<Chet_Ensign%LDS -at- notes -dot- worldcom -dot- com> writes:
>From: Chet Ensign <Chet_Ensign%LDS -at- notes -dot- worldcom -dot- com>
>Subject: STC attendees reactions to SGML sessions?
>Date: 9 May 1995 03:23:54 -0000

>Not being able to attend the STC annual conference this year, I'm just curious.
>Did any readers of TECHWR-L attend any of the SGML sessions that were offered
>and, if so, did you have any reactions to them? I'm especially curious to know
>how much interest there was among those attending, and whether they found the
>sessions worthwhile or not.

>Thanks,

>/chet

>---
>Chet Ensign Phone: (908) 771-9221
>Director, Electronic Publishing Email: chet -at- lds -dot- com
>Logical Design Solutions, Inc. Email(home): censign -at- interserv -dot- com
>---

I'd be interested in responses to these questions, too, so I hope people will
respond to the newsgroup. Thanks.

Jean Pfleiderer


Previous by Author: Adobe Acrobat
Next by Author: Word for Word users?
Previous by Thread: STC attendees reactions to SGML sessions?
Next by Thread: Re: STC attendees reactions to SGML sessions?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads