Re: Naughty, naughty!

Subject: Re: Naughty, naughty!
From: "Virginia L. Krenn" <asdxvlk -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 12:20:30 -0600

Mike,

I could agree with your posting if you had omitted the third sentence.
I don't think that this list needs another debate on liberalism vs
conservatism.

Virginia Krenn
asdxvlk.okway.okstate.edu


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Naughty, naughty!
Author: Michael LaTorra <mikel -at- accugraph -dot- com> at SMTP
Date: 3/13/95 9:11 AM


John --

You violated the first rule of netiquette by posting a private
msg. to a public list. You owe Joe Fockler an apology.
And this has nothing to do with the fact that, in terms of
the politics involved, he's right and you're wrong. This is
simply a matter of courtesy.


Live long & prosper,
Mike LaTorra

Documentation Supervisor
Accugraph Inc.
mikel -at- accugraph -dot- com
..........................................................................
The opinions expressed are my own, ][ "The superstitions of intellectuals
and not necessarily those of my ][ are still superstitions -- and they
company -- but they probably ][ have a lot of them. The real ques-
should be. ][ tion is why we keep listening to
][ them after their nostrums have
][ failed time and time again."
][ -- Thomas Sowell
....................................................................


Previous by Author: Re[2]: QUERY: Mouse nomenclature?
Next by Author: Re: chapter-based numbering
Previous by Thread: Naughty, naughty!
Next by Thread: tech jobs in Richmond, VA


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads