TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:'Women' as an adjective (was RE: sex or gender?) From:"Bailey, Doug S" <dsbailey -at- PO4 -dot- PCMAIL -dot- INGR -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 10 Feb 1995 07:48:00 CST
Tammy's query on 'sex' vs. 'gender' reminded me of a
pet peeve of mine, one I've had for years.
The media will often identify someone's gender through the
use of the word 'woman' or 'women', as in "There are 30
women firefighters on the force." I had the understanding
that it is proper to use 'female' in these instances, as in
"There are 30 female firefighters..." In fact, it has been years
since I've last heard 'female' used in this way. Even 'men' or
'man' seems to be coming into vogue, though I do
remember hearing something like, "There are 70 male
firefighters on the force" not very long ago. This seems to be
a double standard, or perhaps the change has been slower in
regards to men.
Is this a result of feminist pressure?
Is this usage of 'women' or 'men' an accepted form? Has
this been the standard in 'proper' English, or has the media
adopted this change on their own?
Have I been attending the wrong schools all these years? :-)
Doug
Douglas S. Bailey, Technical Writer
System Software Documentation
Intergraph Corporation
Huntsville, AL 35894-0001
x6072
