Forw: Your request to sign off the TECHWR-L list

[Gendreau Simon <Simon -dot- Gendreau -at- PWC -dot- UTC -dot- COM>]

Read the following message that i received.

Note ; I even tried "REVIEW", and i received a message that tells me
that the system does not recognize me?????????????????

Plesae somebody help me or unsuscribe me with my autorisation


Thanks


---- Forwarded message follows-----

> From owner-TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU Wed Jan 11 21:12:50 1995
> Received: from chessie.PWC.COM by saugus.PWC.COM (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
>           id AA29416; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 21:12:49 -0500
> Received: from xmail (xmail.PWC.COM) by chessie.PWC.COM with ESMTP
>       (1.37.109.10G/16.2) id AA070336767; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 21:12:47 -0500
> Received: from utrcgw.utc.com by xmail (PMDF V4.3-13 #5613)
>  id <01HLQFYWY4YO0022B7 -at- xmail>; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 21:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from VM1.ucc.okstate.edu by utrcgw.utc.com (PMDF #2906 )
>  id <01HLQFX7FIVK002J56 -at- utrcgw -dot- utc -dot- com>; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 21:07:26 EST
> Received: from OSUVM1.BITNET by VM1.ucc.okstate.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
>  with BSMTP id 2866; Wed, 11 Jan 95 20:09:22 CST
> Received: from VM1.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU by OSUVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.08 R208004)
>  with BSMTP id 2368; Wed, 11 Jan 95 14:44:16 CST
> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 14:44:16 -0600
> From: BITNET list server at OSUVM1 <LISTSERV -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> (1.8a)
> Subject: Your request to sign off the TECHWR-L list
> To: Simon.Gendreau
> Reply-To: TECHWR-L-Request -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Message-Id: <01HLQFX7LYCY002J56 -at- utrcgw -dot- utc -dot- com>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
> X-Lsv-Listid: TECHWR-L


> Wed, 11 Jan 1995 14:44:10

> No  entry for  your Simon -dot- Gendreau -at- PWC -dot- UTC -dot- COM  address could  be found  in
 the
> TECHWR-L list at VM1.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU. Here are a number of possible reasons
 why
> you might still be getting mail from the list:

> 1.  You could  be subscribed  under a  different, but  equivalent address.
 For
> instance, if your e-mail address as it  appears in the 'From:' line of
 messages
> coming from  you has the misfortune  of depending on the  distance between
 your
> workstation and  the terminal room  door, you  were probably subscribed  from
 a
> different address and, while your mail  system knows that the two addresses
 are
> equivalent, LISTSERV has no  way to know that. In this case  the only thing
 you
> can  do, beyond  contacting the  list  owner, is  to send  a "REVIEW
 TECHWR-L"
> command to find out under what address you are subscribed, and try to
 duplicate
> it with the help of your user support people.

> 2.  If you  are a  BITNET user,  you might  be subscribed  under your
 Internet
> address and sending  this command via BITNET, or vice  versa. Most BITNET
 sites
> have registered their Internet addresses  in the BITNET nodes database,
 BITEARN
> NODES (the "tag" containing this information  is called ':internet' - if you
 do
> not understand  any of this,  just bring  a copy of  this message to  your
 user
> support people).  Unfortunately, some sites  have still  not done that,  and
 in
> such cases  LISTSERV has no  way to determine  that, for instance,  BITNET
 node
> XYZCOL1 is the same as Internet host  VM3.XYZ.EDU. If you suspect this might
 be
> your problem,  try resending  your request via  both interactive  message
 (SEND
> under VMS, TELL under VM) and e-mail.

> 3. You  might be  subscribed under  an equivalent yet  different address  -
 for
> instance,  one with  explicit gatewaying,  or an  X.400 address  with
 different
> ordering of  the various components,  etc. You  could send a  "REVIEW
 TECHWR-L"
> command and inspect the  list membership to find out whether  this is the
 case,
> and ask the list owners to remove that address from the list.

> 4. You could be  subscribed to the list under another  account, from which
 mail
> is being automatically forwarded to your Simon -dot- Gendreau -at- PWC -dot- UTC -dot- COM account.
 In
> that case you should be able to leave the list by resending the signoff
 request
> from the account in question.

> 5. You could be subscribed to the list indirectly, via a "redistribution"
 list.
> That is, one of the subscribers to the LISTSERV list is in fact a mailing
 list,
> to  which  you are  yourself  subscribed  (note  that  this "sub-list"  is
 not
> necessarily managed  by LISTSERV and,  in fact,  such lists are  often
 manually
> maintained, in  which case the  only way  to leave the  list is to  contact
 the
> person who  maintains it). Since you  are not directly subscribed  to
 TECHWR-L,
> the  only  way  for  you  to  stop getting  the  postings  is  to  contact
 the
> administrator of this sub-list and ask him to sign you off.

> You  should be  able to  contact the  list owners  by simply  replying to
 this
> message (if you do not know how to  reply to a message in your mailbox, you
 can
> send a new message to 'TECHWR-L-request -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU' instead).