TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: 3-ring binders From:"Virginia L. Krenn" <asdxvlk -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Date:Tue, 25 Oct 1994 16:57:57 -0500
Surely I'm not the only person who wants to have accurate up-to-date
information. And if no one inserts update pages, then what happens to
the millions of them that IBM sends out every year?
What kinds of users were surveyed? Are we analysts / programmers that
much different from other users?
Virginia
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Author: "Doug, Data Librarian at Ext 4225" <engstromdd -at- phibred -dot- com> at SMTP
At the 1989 STC convention, I heard a presenter (the name escapes me) who
said the breakdown on inserting manual updates is (approximately) as
follows:
1) If you have an authority who regularly inspects manuals and has the
power to impose sanctions for failure to update, (such as military IG's)
compliance above 95 percent can be achieved.
2) If there is a technical librarian whose number-two priority is
handling updates, compliance of 50 to 60 percent can be expected.
3) If inserting changes is left entirely to individual users, compliance
percentage plummets to the low single digits.
The figures where based on the consultant's research and experience.
Doug "There are no small projects,
ENGSTROMDD -at- phibred -dot- com just incredibly bad initial
estimates."
