Re: passives, etc.

Subject: Re: passives, etc.
From: "Charles P. Campbell" <cpc -at- PRISM -dot- NMT -dot- EDU>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 15:11:02 MST

Time gets strangely out of joint in this medium. I just dispatched
a message whose moral was "understand grammar. Avoid dogma," then
read Michael Spooner's very sensible comments on grammatical dogma.

Previous by Author: Re: Active vs. Passive
Next by Author: Re: The Associated Press Stylebook
Previous by Thread: Re: passives, etc.
Next by Thread: Re: passives, etc.

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads