TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
First, let me say that it is too bad that you have such bad experience
with STC competitions. But I must come to the defense of the No. CA
competition. This competition is hosted by the East Bay, SF, Scto,
and Silicon Valley chapters on a rotating basis. What happens
consistently in the judging meetings is an overview of the requirements
of lead judges and team judges.
Overall guidelines:
Standard comment form used
At least two sets of comments for each entry
Comments, had to be typed, and offer substantive
comments, "Too, crowded" "Poor Quality" and statements
as such weren't allowed -- constructive criticism was only
allowed. And if the team judges did not provide quality
comments, their lead judges were responsible for doing them.
Of course, not all the judges were perfect, but making the lead judges
accountable really made a difference.
