Re: STC competition

Subject: Re: STC competition
From: Marian Harry-Young <odinba!odin!marian -at- UUNET -dot- UU -dot- NET>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 1994 09:36:32 PST

First, let me say that it is too bad that you have such bad experience
with STC competitions. But I must come to the defense of the No. CA
competition. This competition is hosted by the East Bay, SF, Scto,
and Silicon Valley chapters on a rotating basis. What happens
consistently in the judging meetings is an overview of the requirements
of lead judges and team judges.

Overall guidelines:

Standard comment form used

At least two sets of comments for each entry

Comments, had to be typed, and offer substantive
comments, "Too, crowded" "Poor Quality" and statements
as such weren't allowed -- constructive criticism was only
allowed. And if the team judges did not provide quality
comments, their lead judges were responsible for doing them.

Of course, not all the judges were perfect, but making the lead judges
accountable really made a difference.

My $.02

Previous by Author: want ads
Next by Author: Survey on use of WANs
Previous by Thread: Re: STC competition
Next by Thread: Re: STC competition

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads