TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Multimedia or Human Factors From:MSTSACX -at- GSUVM1 -dot- BITNET Date:Thu, 23 Dec 1993 18:04:07 EST
Ann Duin tried to start a thread about multimedia--what can we do with it.
I'd like to address this issue.
I think the first thing we can do with it is figure out what it is, because
no one really knows. Within the computer community, it refers to a PC
that's capable of displaying data and full motion video, and playing sound.
Within the business community, multimedia refers to 500 channel cable
systems that are capable of carrying telephone conversations (often with
pictures), interactive television, and more opportunities to purchase
cubic zirconium than we can imagine. I prefer the business definition,
because it seems more like the multimedia that the average Joe and Jill are
likely to encounter. But in our work, the computer definition is more
appropriate.
That's not because we're writing about computers, but computers will
increasingly become the medium of delivery of workplace and product info.
Actual multimedia has little to do with things like online help. Software
is not inherently a visual topic and doesn't really need all the extra
bells and whistles that multimedia provides.
Multimedia is more likely to be useful in more traditional areas of
technical communication: parts catalogs, maintenance documentation, reference
materials and policies and procedures.
The multimedia that will be incorporated in these types of documents
are not likely to be the full-motion video type; instead, they'll be
lower-tech. Parts catalogs will have digitized photos of items, maybe
sound clips from cassettes and other audiovisual products. Maintenance
documentation might include digitized photos, some animation (to show
processes), and sound (so people don't have to read while performing
an operation). Reference materials might include photos, interviews
(if appropriate), and clips of related EXISTING videos (if rights are
available). I emphasize existing because the cost of producing new
video clips will be prohibitive. We might even see the rise of video
clip libraries as we've seen the growth of clip art. Policies and
procedures are the last area. These will be tied in with databases
(because most information in procedures applies to content in a
database, such as employees) (databases aren't traditionally thought
of as multimedia), photos (for example, your employee record might
include a digitized photo), and images from an image database (remember
the commendation you received? a photo of it is in your records, too).
The big question is: will multimedia be appropriate? If it provides
an appropriate, more cost-effective and more timely solution, the
answer is yes. I do think some of these answers come from human
factors, but more of these answers come from a good business analysis
and a good understanding of the business problem that the information is
intended to solve. The study of performance technology (I hate the term
and take no responsibility for it) offers far more insight into the
answer to the question than human factors. Human factors is concerned
about whether the solution is easily used by people. Performance
technology is concerned about an earlier issue: how do we state the
problem in the first place and what principles guide selection of a
solution?
"
Saul Carliner Ph.D. Student
Instructional Technology Geo. State Univ.
Note new userid----> mstsacx -at- gsuvm1 -dot- gsu -dot- edu 404/892-3945