Re: Opinions please

Subject: Re: Opinions please
From: Ad absurdum per aspera <jtchew -at- CSA3 -dot- LBL -dot- GOV>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1993 13:41:00 PST

>> What points would you pass on to them as the key fundamentals of
>> technical writing?

{Len's good advice deleted}

* Immerse yourself in the subject matter. You might not become
a subject-matter expert to the point of being able to do
original, creative work, but you sure as heck won't be able
to write with accuracy, completeness, and verisimilitude
about something you don't understand. Feel proud, not ashamed,
when you observe that no more than a third of the stuff in your
notebook ever makes it into print.

* If something is too hard to explain, maybe it could be made
simpler... and maybe, as the first person who tried to explain
it to outsiders, you're the one to figure out how, or at least
point out the problem.

* Get to the point. Shorten and simplify ruthlessly at the
sentence, paragraph, and even chapter levels, starting
with your own embellishments upon the basic subject matter.
Remember also that the meat of your story is usually in the
middle -- a "false lede" and a contrived attempt at a tidy
conclusion should be among the first candidates for the ax.

* Never even consider writing a caption or cutline for an
illustration you aren't looking at.

* Own your work. The moral courage to decide what it should be
and stand up for it, combined with the skill to be right in
these matters, is what separates a professional communicator
from any old 8-to-5 drudge with a typewriter. Owning your
work also implies seeing it through. There's a lot more to
writing than putting words on paper -- and a lot more to
achieving total quality in publications than writing.

* You can't never edit or evan proofread your own work work and
computers, which don't know grammar very well yet much less
have taste are useful for the first pass) but are no substitute
for a real editor. :)

Good luck,
Joe
"The pallid pimp of the dead-line/The enervate of the pen" -Robert Service


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: one-person
Next by Author: Grammar and Style Checkers
Previous by Thread: Re: Opinions please
Next by Thread: A Controversial Thought


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads