TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: plagiarism in technical communication? From:"Mark L. Levinson" <nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 02 Nov 2023 18:52:10 +0200
I was a manager of technical writers back in the cuneiform days, and the
manuals of the particular company I worked for used to include a credit
line naming the writer. I opposed the practice (and eventually
terminated it) because if anybody inside the company wanted to know
which writer was responsible for the brilliant explanation of Product A
and the manual was written by Writer B but thoroughly revised by Writer
C, the credit could conceivably spark an unwinnable battle. Worse yet,
if Writer X needed a bit of help from Writer Y, Writer Y could think
"Why expend my time and skill when somebody else is going to get the
credit?"Â In a context like that, I can understand the notion of
intra-company plagiarism.
--------------------------------------------
Mark L. Levinson - nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il
--------------------------------------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com