Re: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Hi folks,
I manage cybersecurity standards. Currently, our docs are extremely long
and cover (in my opinion) way too many topics. I constantly have people
(regulators, users, etc.) coming to me to ask in which standard they can
find x topic covered.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
References:
Standards: Few & long vs. many & short: From: Jessica Behles
Previous by Author:
RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Next by Author:
Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Previous by Thread:
RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Next by Thread:
RE: Standards: Few & long vs. many & short
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads