TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What do you call the Three Dots? From:Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Cardimon, Craig" <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com> Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:25:34 -0400
We called our three dots Moe, Larry, and Curly. ;)
But if it's vertical, is it an ellipsis or is it a very skinny hamburger
(real term with binary dispositions toward it in the UX crowd)?
These types of buttons are everywhere. Whether people know what they
mean/do, who knows. I think the bigger problem is that you have multiple
conventions for the same button to contend with. If you haven't already,
start documenting these cases. If you have a UX team/person, they're a good
place to start. Otherwise you may want to make friends with QA before
approaching Development with UI changes.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com>
wrote:
> Next thing is, you'll be telling me no one knows what the pound sign is.
> Sigh.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Robert Lauriston
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:03 PM
> To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Subject: Re: What do you call the Three Dots?
>
> Yeah, I don't understand why anyone would not use the self-explanatory
> button label. In my experience, most people don't know what "ellipsis"
> means. Even fewer than know "asterisk."
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Friedman <
> daniel -dot- friedman42 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > Since the button can be represented in text, why not call it the *...*
> > button? To me it is always more intuitive to identify buttons by the
> > visual appearance rather than giving them some other name. On top of
> > that, the alternate name will not show up in the software on
> > screenreaders if it is not part of a tooltip or alt.
> >
> > On a lighter note, in developer circles, any button from a combination
> > of dots or lines has a food name. According to this, you could also go
> > with calling it the Meatballs button:
> > http://image.slidesharecdn.com/lukasz-przywarty-productcamp-2015-15053
> > 0064210-lva1-app6891/95/hamburgerless-on-creative-mobile-navigation-16
> > -638.jpg
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Marguerite Krupp
> > <mkrupp128 -at- gmail -dot- com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If youâre writing across platforms, Iâd stick with âEllipsisâ. Itâs
> >> more commonly understood, and âMoreâ can also refer to the selection
> >> menu you get on a right-click of the mouse. This will probably change
> >> as interfaces evolve, but for now, the former is a safe choice. If
> >> your stuff is translated, you might check with your translation
> >> agency to see whatâs universally understood.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On Oct 16, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I used to call the three dots element the Ellipsis Button.
> >> >
> >> > However, I see other technical and UX writers are calling this
> >> > element
> >> the More Button.
> >> >
> >> > How say you?
> >> >
> >> > Cordially,
> >> > Craig Cardimon
> >> > Senior Technical Writer
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and
> >> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do
> >> not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any
> >> attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> >> immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content
> >> > strategy
> >> and content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >> >
> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> >
> >> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mkrupp128 -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> >> >
> >> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> >> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more
> >> > resources
> >> and info.
> >> >
> >> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> >> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >> >
> >> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> >> > public
> >> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content
> >> strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as daniel -dot- friedman42 -at- gmail -dot- com
> .
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >>
> >>
> >> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> >> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> >> and info.
> >>
> >> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> >> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >>
> >> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> >> public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Daniel Friedman*
> > *friedmantechdocs.com* <http://friedmantechdocs.com>
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> > and content development | http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as robert -at- lauriston -dot- com -dot-
> >
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> > techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >
> >
> > Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> > http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> and info.
> >
> > Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> > online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >
> > Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our
> > public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
> Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not
> read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any
> attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
> notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Bill Swallow
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com