Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

Subject: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
From: "Monique Semp" <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:10:08 -0700

The action of sharing a view "via URL" by itself requires

inference to know what "via URL" means. Is that a shared link, a PUT, a
POST, or something else?

As the original poster of the "via" question, I think we can put this thread to rest. I've made the decision to go with "via" for a variety of now quite well-informed reasons that are applicable within the context of my content, readers, doc structure, feature use, etc.

Thanks for the lively discussion :-),
-Monique
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Previous by Author: Re: Word tool/plugin recommendation?
Next by Author: active vs. passive (was: "via" - why often verboten ?)
Previous by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?
Next by Thread: Re: "via" - why often verboten ?

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

TechWhirl Sponsors

About TechWhirl

Latest Articles from TechWhirl