TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: For all you comma-chasers out there -- second attempt
Subject:RE: For all you comma-chasers out there -- second attempt From:Suzette Leeming <suzette -dot- leeming -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com> Date:Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:24:08 -0400
The fact that "distribution" didn't end in a gerund helped their case as
well.
Suzette Leeming
On Mar 16, 2017 1:47 PM, "Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- hologic -dot- com> wrote:
> No.
>
> "Distribution" is a normal part of their duties (they're drivers).
> "Packing for distribution" is not (they don't "pack").
>
> If the serial comma had been included, then "distribution" would have been
> set off as its own task, and they would therefore be exempt from overtime.
>
> Without the comma, it becomes "packing for shipment or distribution" which
> is the equivalent of "(packing for shipment) or (packing for
> distribution)." Because in this case "distribution" is not listed as an
> exemption, they would be eligible for overtime.
>
> If the comma had been there they would have lost, and would likely not
> have brought the case.
>
> Steve
>
> On Thursday, March 16, 2017 12:05 AM, Timothy J Slager:
>
> Except, if I read it correctly, it didn't change the case. Either way, the
> drivers would have won.
>
> Still, nice story.
>
> tims
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Ken Poshedly
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:58 PM
> To: TECHWR-L Writing
> Subject: For all you comma-chasers out there -- second attempt
>
> In case it didn't make it the first time . . .
>http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/15/health/oxford-comma-maine-
> court-case-trnd/index.html
>
> -- Ken in Atlanta
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as suzette -dot- leeming -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com