Re: punctuation et al. rules

Subject: Re: punctuation et al. rules
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:20:58 -0800

I know there's a dastardly plot afoot to remove hyphens from all written
communication. I was a part of this conspiracy until I learned that hyphens
work when they work!


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Ant Davey <ant -at- ant-davey -dot- com> wrote:
The way to win the argument is to ask your boss 'What if there were two
of these connectors?'

What would he do with 7 pin connectors? And if it works for two, why
not one?

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Annette Reilly <annetterieee -at- gmail -dot- com>

> It can be a problem when a hasty reader looks for seven (7) of those pin
> modifiers. The hyphen helps.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


punctuation et al. rules: From: Ken Poshedly
Re: punctuation et al. rules: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: punctuation et al. rules: From: Annette Reilly

Previous by Author: RE: Word x-ref formatting question
Next by Author: Re: Conversion of PDF to word
Previous by Thread: RE: punctuation et al. rules
Next by Thread: Re: punctuation et al. rules

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads