TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: showing text correlation - other than by color ?
Subject:Re: showing text correlation - other than by color ? From:Kathleen MacDowell <kathleen -dot- eamd -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net> Date:Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:14:32 -0600
Is there a possibility you could draw a line between corresponding
sections? If so, you could circle the relevant text or even use a really
light color to show the correspondences. If you could add the line, you
could use the same highlight for all of them.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Monique Semp <monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net>
wrote:
> Hello, WR-L-ers,
>
> Just looking for alternative ideas for showing logical correlation between
> two big sections of text from two different docs. The goal is to show that
> doc-1 and doc-2 are basically equivalent.
>
> As the text was given to me, itâs in a 2-column, 1-long-row table: doc-1
> on the left, doc-2 on the right. (The text in the table isnât the full text
> of either doc; itâs just the relevant portions of doc-1 and doc-2 that
> discuss the same concepts.) The corresponding portions are
> color-highlighted. So thereâre gray, hello, green, etc. portions in both
> columns, where the gray sections discuss one point, the green another, etc.
>
> It looks very jarring, thatâs for sure. Plus there are all sorts of
> color-blindness considerations, and itâs hard to read.
>
> I thought of simply breaking it up into separate rows (the selected text
> is in the same order for both docs, not interleaved throughout), which is
> much easier to read and parse. But it loses a lot of the visual impact
> showing how closely the docs correlate.
>
> Anyone have any other ideas?
>
> -Monique
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | http://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kathleen -dot- eamd -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Kathleen MacDowell
kathleen -dot- eamd -at- gmail -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com