Re: Sickening stuff from Engineers

Subject: Re: Sickening stuff from Engineers
From: Joe Pairman <joepairman -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Mark Baker <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:08:15 +0100

I also didn't get it, and so assumed I was missing something obvious. It
read pretty well to me, and I didn't take it to be denigrating typography
at all â rather, it pointed out that implementing decent typography can be
trickier than one might think.

Joe

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:09 PM, <mbaker -at- analecta -dot- com> wrote:

> I too am puzzled. What's the objection to the article? It strikes me a well
> written and well-illustrated. All in all, an exemplary bit of technical
> communication. No idea what is supposed to be sickening about it.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+mbaker=analecta -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
> Of Wright, Lynne
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 9:21 AM
> To: Steve Hudson <sh1448291904 -at- gmail -dot- com>; austechwriter -at- freelists -dot- org;
> techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Sickening stuff from Engineers
>
> Are you implying that the content of the article is somehow wrong or
> objectionable?
>
> I used to be a typesetter back in the day, using a DOS-based program to
> generate galleys for print production. Given how limited the options for
> finessing type were back then, I found this article pretty
> interesting/illuminating in terms of how to work with digital type for
> electronic media.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Steve Hudson
> Sent: August-28-16 12:12 PM
> To: austechwriter -at- freelists -dot- org; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Sickening stuff from Engineers
>
> https://medium.engineering/typography-is-impossible-
> 5872b0c7f891#.h6obkxudm
>
> Of course, I couldn't read that without a comment.
>
> To you guys, I will say this. This link contains high macabre comedy
> regarding how an engineer approaches typography. I need medicating
> urgently.
>
> Steve Hudson
> Word Heretic
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Sickening stuff from Engineers: From: Steve Hudson
RE: Sickening stuff from Engineers: From: Wright, Lynne
RE: Sickening stuff from Engineers: From: mbaker

Previous by Author: LibreOffice and OO
Next by Author: Re: Sickening stuff from Engineers
Previous by Thread: RE: Sickening stuff from Engineers
Next by Thread: Re: Sickening stuff from Engineers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads